The invisibility of the often-invisible groups is also notable in the policy documents. Although these are important for distributive justice and for recognizing vulnerabilities, the current setting reveals risks regarding the possibilities of transitioning to a low-carbon food system. Our results suggest that food security and farmer livelihoods have dominated justice related considerations at the cost of environmental sustainability. Our data consist of Finnish policy strategies relating to the national food system and data from interviews with experts involved in the policy processes. In this article, we take these outcomes as the starting point to study how they relate to the distributive, procedural, and recognitive aspects of food justice in the context of Finnish food policies. From the normative perspective of food justice, a food system should produce three principal outcomes: food security and nutrition, livelihoods and fair income, and environmental sustainability. This knowledge can reveal blind spots and development needs and increase the transparency of potentially conflicting goals, which is essential for designing just transition policies. However, to achieve a just transition and create policies to support the goal of developing sustainable food systems, we need more knowledge of the ways current policies tackle justice. The need to create more sustainable food systems calls for careful attention to justice in making the transition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |